Dogs possess their own distinct sense of wellness and fashion. They have no need for velvet coats or leather boots; their fur and paws are perfectly sufficient. Instead of perfumed waters, they naturally prefer to roll in delightfully messy things. It is their human companions who frequently turn them into fashion victims. The market for pet fashion and grooming products generates billions of euros annually. Luxury brands like Gucci, Prada, and Louis Vuitton have not only recognized dogs as stylish accessories but also create a myriad of accessories for them—ranging from elegant handbags for Chihuahua transport to elaborate jewelry, boots, and even evening wear for pampered urban pets.
Despite the fact that most dogs are adept at following scents but not reading text, fashion magazines tailored for canines do exist. These publications showcase products that the average pug would likely never imagine. The latest issue of Dogue, a Los Angeles-based dog magazine, features stunning displays of gem-encrusted collars, dog tutus, sunglasses, and decorative bows. It also includes an interview with the owner of a canine model and profiles of influential US ‘petfluencers.’ This print magazine originated in 2021 from a digital project called ‘Coverdogs,’ which compiled satirical magazine covers featuring dogs. Published quarterly, Dogue sells several hundred copies per issue, according to its founder, Olga Portnaya.
In stark contrast to the world’s most renowned human fashion magazine, New York’s Vogue, the Californian Dogue appears as a Miniature Pinscher beside a Rottweiler. Condé Nast, the publishing house behind Vogue, boasts an estimated global revenue of two billion euros. Yet, this media titan feels challenged by the relatively tiny Dogue and has initiated a lawsuit against the magazine in federal court. In their complaint, the publisher’s legal team argues that the dog magazine’s logo deliberately aims to confuse readers by implying a connection between the two publications, which they claim ‘would likely cause irreparable harm to Condé Nast.’
Ironically, Vogue itself is recognized for its dog-friendly stance. Its long-serving editor-in-chief, Anna Wintour, is the owner of three dogs named Boo Radley, Harper, and Atticus Finch. Condé Nast’s conflict with Dogue began last year when Vogue launched its own digital initiative, also titled Dogue, which was dedicated to celebrity dogs like Demi Moore’s Chihuahua Pilaf and Billie Eilish’s dog Shark. This new venture, naturally, created a direct conflict with the already established Dogue.
The editor-in-chief of the underdog magazine asserts that her publication is a distinctive parody, which was founded long before Vogue decided to delve into dog-themed content. She also highlights that the brand has been officially registered, reviewed, and approved. Nevertheless, Condé Nast is now demanding a name change, financial damages, and even the destruction of all existing copies. Olga Portnaya views this situation as more than just a dispute over a dog-related brand; she sees it as a broader struggle for creative niches. The outcome of this legal ‘dogfight’ remains uncertain. Perhaps, as in the animal kingdom, the bigger, louder dog doesn’t always prevail—wit and intelligence often play a crucial role.
